Bittertang

comments 2
Architectural Effects / Material Culture / Popular / Rococo / Uncanny
1767 Fragonard

bittertang1

bittertang2

bittertang3

I have fallen in love with Bittertang. They are a duo of artist/architects who refer to their studio as “the farm.” Michael Loverich and Antonio Torres spoke last Tuesday night at Parsons, accepting The Architectural League Prize (one of six firms to win it this year), and introducing their bizarre work. They espouse a love for the hilarious and the pleasurable, and point to the Rococo as an underutilized source of inspiration. (They showed a photo very similar to the 1767 Fragonard painting above, “L’Essaim d’Amour,” or Swarm of Love, which they called a “baby omelet.”) Not only has poché returned in a big way, but folly and fancy breathe new life as well. “Architecture should be hilarious!” they declared, and I agree. After all, humor in the face of the chaos and horror of the world is a path to redemption. Like Tschumi’s follies in Parc de la Villette. The work of Bittertang is unsettling as well, for example all the “babies” they invented, but what disturbs me also intrigues me. Not unlike the work of Dinos and Jake Chapman. Take, for example, the succulent piñata pictured above, from The Architectural League Prize exhibition at Parsons, inspired by the story of Romulus and Remus. I wanted to steal it and take it home with me. Yum! ♦

The Author

This is the personal website of Dariel Cobb. I am an architecture theorist, historian, designer, and educator.

2 Comments

  1. Hey there! I’m loving your blog; I’m forwarding it to my husband who is in school for landscape architecture as inspiration. Hope all us well with you guys!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *